Omaha Vette Graveyard wrote:
That's why it's important that it's a substantial engine setback. It makes a huge difference, like a 10 percent change in weight distribution (50/50 vs. 60/40)...
So having the engine >99% (just not 100%) behind the front axle is NOT 'substantial' setback, such that it's most accurately lumped in with having the engine entirely overhanging in front of the axle centerline?...And that moving the engine back 2mm so that the front edge of it goes from being 1mm in front of the axle centerline to 1mm behind the axle centerlilne makes a like a 10% change in weight distribution?
Seriously, you are directly implying that there is
less difference separating the effects an engine being 100% in front of (0% behind) the axle centerline from <1% in front of (>99% behind) the axle centerline (>99% variation), than there is separating the effects an engine being >99% behind the axle centerline from 100% behind the axle centerline (<1% variation). You don't think it would be more accurate and make more sense for the two "distinct categories" to be similar in scope?
KB58 wrote:
I much rather hear a discussion about how many pixies can be put on the head of a pin.
Knock yourself out.
https://forums.catholic.com/t/how-many-angels-can-fit-on-the-head-of-a-pin/159344