actually, I think the Ford 2300 is heavier with its cast Iron head. (Remember I had the MGB engine tranny combo here for awhile so I got a good feel for the weight of both. Using absolutely not math or engineering, I think I'm gonna start with a 400# spring in front and a 200# in back. Even though I've lost 14 lbs, I'll add 253# in unsprung weight. Since most of that weight is directly above my ass it will be contributing to the rear of the car I imagine. At 6'1 I'm planning on a 18' Tall roll bar.
Looks like you have a good radiator mount there. I may end up stealing parts of it. Not sure if it will work with the Pinto radiator yet.
nick47 wrote:
Many. I've been working on this off and on for awhile.
Front rates were fairly easy to determine using the spreadsheet link on Jack's website. With a .55 motion ratio and a 30-degree spring angle (.48 eff. MR), a 450# spring rate gives me 5+ inches of bump and 3+ inches of droop with a relatively soft 1.76 NF. You can get a better MR, say .6, by moving the lower shock mount farther outboard, but that increases the spring angle so your effective MR doesn't change much, unless you go uber-cantilever with the upper shock mounts, which IMO has its own problems.
Rears were more difficult. I wasn't sure if I should determine the MR off the center of the axle, which would seem to be the pivot point in a turn, or the opposite wheel, which would be the pivot point for a bump. The latter produces a .88 MR, which means a 160# spring rate will give me 2-1/4" in bump and droop with a slightly more severe 2.11 NF.
Incidentally, this is all based on my preliminary sprung/unsprung weight estimates that look so bad I'm almost ashamed to post them. I figured 650# sprung in front, 550# rear, with 150# unsprung in front and 250# rear. That MGB axle is a husky boy. If you think your Ford engine will be lighter than my B-series, and it would almost have to be, then your front rates will be proportionately less than mine.