LocostUSA.com

Learning how to build Lotus Seven replicas...together!
It is currently April 19, 2024, 12:49 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: May 14, 2014, 7:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: May 10, 2014, 1:47 pm
Posts: 6
Location: Birmingham, AL
Here's to the beginning of my GM L67 (3800 Series II) SC build! :cheers:

Step #1 - Planning!

My Dad donated to me their mid 90's Buick Regal GS with the supercharged L67. Car was parked several years ago (running), but with an electrical issue that was never found. Car has around 70,000 miles on it. So I have the engine sourced and excited to have this powerplant with such low mileage. I also have some experience with MegaSquirt and plan to use on this build.

I am curious what else can be used from this Regal besides the engine? Please chime in!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 16, 2014, 7:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: May 10, 2014, 1:47 pm
Posts: 6
Location: Birmingham, AL
I have spent passed couple of days studying suspension setups and the information is dizzying! Where's the simple answer? LOL!

So, I am going to go with IRS and want matching front/rear hub bolt patterns and run 17" wheels. Brake clearance shouldn't be an issue and I want the larger diameter wheels for looks and better ride on these horrible Birmingham AL roads.. With that said, I think I need to concentrate on selecting the IRS setup first since the front spindles *should* be easy to match to the rear. And I plan to wring out the L67 and get closer to 300 HP out of it, so I will need an LSD. Any other criteria to consider when choosing an IRS?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 16, 2014, 10:16 pm 
Offline
Always Moore!
User avatar

Joined: November 9, 2007, 3:40 pm
Posts: 4075
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
I think your wheel size logic may be a bit backwards. Larger wheels are heavier and usually result in a smaller sidewall. Higher unsprung weight and smaller sidewalls are the enemy of ride comfort.

I would sit down and make a list of what needs to happen to make it a car rather than what needs to happen to make it a supercharged 300 hp Locost with IRS and an LSD.

Unless the "better" stuff falls into your lap for a reasonable price and ends up being straight forward I'd go for the simplest/quickest/easiest route possible. The sooner it becomes a driving car the better the chances of it actually being completed. A pile of parts isn't very motivating but a working vehicle sure is. As long as you pick parts that are compatible with the "better" stuff, you can improve the winter after its finished.

_________________
-Andrew
Build Log
Youtube


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 17, 2014, 12:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: March 19, 2011, 10:22 am
Posts: 2394
Location: Holden, Alberta, Canada
a.moore wrote:
I think your wheel size logic may be a bit backwards. Larger wheels are heavier and usually result in a smaller sidewall. Higher unsprung weight and smaller sidewalls are the enemy of ride comfort.

I would sit down and make a list of what needs to happen to make it a car rather than what needs to happen to make it a supercharged 300 hp Locost with IRS and an LSD.

Unless the "better" stuff falls into your lap for a reasonable price and ends up being straight forward I'd go for the simplest/quickest/easiest route possible. The sooner it becomes a driving car the better the chances of it actually being completed. A pile of parts isn't very motivating but a working vehicle sure is. As long as you pick parts that are compatible with the "better" stuff, you can improve the winter after its finished.


Very, very wise words, couldn't have offered better advice myself.

Build a base model, have fun, add hop ups, can't go wrong.

_________________
Perry

'If man built it, man can fix it'
"No one ever told me I couldn't do it."
"If you can't build it safe, don't build it."

Perry's Locost Super Che7enette Build
Perry's TBird Based 5.0L Super 7 L.S.O
Perry's S10 Super 7 The 3rd
Perry's 4th Build The Topolino 500 (Little Mouse) Altered
Perry's 5th Build the Super Slant 6 Super 7
Perry's Final Build the 1929 Mercedes Gazelle


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 17, 2014, 5:43 am 
Offline

Joined: June 24, 2013, 11:48 pm
Posts: 67
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Welcome aboard. There is much to be gained from a single source donor. My car was put together from several different cars at the local pull a part, this approach did cause some headaches.
What kind of car do you want to end up with? Let the answer guide you in the build. Build a car that suits you. We like to cruise country roads in ours, occasionally hit some antique shops and thrift stores. So ours is built oversized with a radio, locking glove box and a trailer hitch
As far as horsepower goes. My car is very heavy compared to most locost a, little over 2100 lbs, I estimate our 5.0 ford to be about 300hp ....the car will get sideways and stay sideways as long as I hold the pedal down. Fun at first then you figure out thT it can be a pita trying to keep the thing out of the ditch. A friend of mine thAt used to own a company that built several hundred of these cars swears that in a typical book chassis car, 150 horsepower will thrill you.
Like I said at first. Build a car that suit you!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 17, 2014, 6:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: November 12, 2008, 6:29 am
Posts: 3567
a.moore wrote:
I think your wheel size logic may be a bit backwards. Larger wheels are heavier and usually result in a smaller sidewall. Higher unsprung weight and smaller sidewalls are the enemy of ride comfort.


Lower sidewalls do make for a harsher ride that's true, but a larger diameter tyre also rolls over bumps much easier and with less deflection than small wheels do.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 17, 2014, 9:28 am 
Offline

Joined: May 10, 2014, 1:47 pm
Posts: 6
Location: Birmingham, AL
Thanks for the all the replies, keep them coming!

Regarding wheel size, I was thinking along the same lines as CheapRacer above larger diameter tires rolling over bumps better. I also like the look of larger wheels/tires.

As far as what I want the car to do...I am with SMartin99 and want something a little more on the comfort side. I don't plan to be ultra-competitive in autocross, just go as fast as possible and have fun. That being said, I am not going for an ultra lightweight build.

Totally agree on not buying a bunch of parts and focusing on getting a running/driving car together, but I also don't want to have buy the same parts multiple times. And I would rather go ahead and engineer in the IRS, otherwise I may never come back and do it!

So let me step back for a moment and say I don't have the answers, but that is why I am here and that is to get advice from all of you who have been down this road. I am all ears!

P.S. - What parts could be used from the Regal?

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 17, 2014, 10:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: October 24, 2008, 2:13 pm
Posts: 5326
Location: Carlsbad, California, USA
Welcome!

It's nice to see another Buick 3.8L V6 Locost started. I doing a Locost using it's (reverse engineered) cousin, the Ford 3.8L V6 :lol: . I've had a 3.8L in two cars and it's a very nice engine with plenty of power and torque. Even stock, your supercharged V6 is going to give you a lot, so no harm in postponing engine modifications until a "Phase II" project instead of in the initial build.

I'll be looking forward to your build.

Cheers,

Lonnie

_________________
Damn! That front slip angle is way too large and the Ackerman is just a muddle.

Build Log: viewtopic.php?f=35&t=5886


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 17, 2014, 11:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: April 12, 2010, 5:40 pm
Posts: 2081
Location: san francisco bay area
Regarding tires, cheapracer and a.moore are both right in regards to specific issues. ..
A larger diameter tire will bridge a void with less suspension movement because it will reach both sides of the void more readily, reducing the droop that happens, a taller sidewall will absorb more shock than a short one.
Sidewall deflection can be "sort of" controlled by the tires construction but it will include some sideways deflection in corners that's harder to adjust for, an argument for short tires. ..
If you're more interested in track days I'd go with a short sidewall but for a primarily street driven car I'd go with a taller sidewall.
With some research you should be able to figure out two sizes (rim size that is) of tire that will give you a similiar enough tire diameter that having two sets of rims/tires will give you good performance in both situations.

_________________
"There are times when a broken tool is better than a sound one, or a twisted personality more useful than a whole one.
For instance, a whole beer bottle isn't half the weapon that half a beer bottle is ..." Randall Garrett


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 17, 2014, 12:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: May 10, 2014, 1:47 pm
Posts: 6
Location: Birmingham, AL
oldejack wrote:
With some research you should be able to figure out two sizes (rim size that is) of tire that will give you a similiar enough tire diameter that having two sets of rims/tires will give you good performance in both situations.


Good idea on having two sets of wheels/tires with overall same diameter. Keeps same geometry and suspension/steering setup. Run a smaller diameter wheel and larger sidewall for everyday driving, and have a second set with larger diameter wheels and shorter sidewalls.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 20, 2014, 8:57 am 
Offline

Joined: May 20, 2014, 8:42 am
Posts: 40
Location: Southern Ontario
I think I would determine the gearing in the tranny and diff (get your tranny and diff)before considering tires. Your tire diameter is pretty much determined by your gearing. There are formulas that consider gearing, tire diameter and rpms to give speed.
Once you know what diameter tire you need- then you can decide what diameter rim you want to stick in there and how big or small the sidewall will be.
If you end up with long gears, then you don't want to put large diameter tires on. Doing 70 in 1st really isn't fun. Nor is pulling 6000 rpm in high gear at 50mph.

I have some 13" tires with a diameter of 25". I also have some 18" tires with a diameter of 24" so rim size is less important than tire diameter.
Doug


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 20, 2014, 7:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: May 10, 2014, 1:47 pm
Posts: 6
Location: Birmingham, AL
h20loo wrote:
I think I would determine the gearing in the tranny and diff (get your tranny and diff)before considering tires. Your tire diameter is pretty much determined by your gearing. There are formulas that consider gearing, tire diameter and rpms to give speed.
Once you know what diameter tire you need- then you can decide what diameter rim you want to stick in there and how big or small the sidewall will be.
If you end up with long gears, then you don't want to put large diameter tires on. Doing 70 in 1st really isn't fun. Nor is pulling 6000 rpm in high gear at 50mph.

I have some 13" tires with a diameter of 25". I also have some 18" tires with a diameter of 24" so rim size is less important than tire diameter.
Doug


Well, I'm looking at mating a T5 (or variant) using a bell housing from a '92-'94 S10 4 cylinder. For the IRS, I am still looking at options. The best I have seen so far is a C5 setup, but haven't priced it yet. If I go the C5 route, there should be some ratio options or change the ring/pinion. Overall, this combo would allow an average diameter tire to be used and won't narrow my choices.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 20, 2014, 8:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: April 12, 2010, 5:40 pm
Posts: 2081
Location: san francisco bay area
I's recommend considering the ford 8.8 irs diff, the factory ratio's are; 2.26, 2.47, 2.73, 3.08, 3.27, 3.31, 3.45, 3.55, 3.73, 4.10 & 4.56. ..
Somewhere in there is the number that will work for you and those diff's can handle some major power especially in a lightweight car.

_________________
"There are times when a broken tool is better than a sound one, or a twisted personality more useful than a whole one.
For instance, a whole beer bottle isn't half the weapon that half a beer bottle is ..." Randall Garrett


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 20, 2014, 8:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: May 10, 2014, 1:47 pm
Posts: 6
Location: Birmingham, AL
oldejack wrote:
I's recommend considering the ford 8.8 irs diff, the factory ratio's are; 2.26, 2.47, 2.73, 3.08, 3.27, 3.31, 3.45, 3.55, 3.73, 4.10 & 4.56. ..
Somewhere in there is the number that will work for you and those diff's can handle some major power especially in a lightweight car.


What are some Fords the 8.8 IRS was available in? Quick Google search shows they aren't double wishbone and use the half-shaft as a support. Appreciate the info and ratio listing, plenty to choose from!

EDIT: I was searching google pics on my phone and see now the 8.8 IRS came in double wishbone. Also found a nice link another Locost member posted on the 8.8 IRS.

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=14439&start=0


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: May 21, 2014, 7:06 am 
Offline
We are Slotus!
User avatar

Joined: October 6, 2009, 9:29 am
Posts: 7651
Location: Tallahassee, FL (The Center of the Known Universe)
I think you'll find the 8.8 from a late model Explorer has the best mounting design. The "ears" on the diff cover make all the difference, plus it's stronger. You can mix-n-match that cover with other diffs, if that works better for you, but that cover is the one you want. Do a search for "Grasshopper Legs" (no kiddin!) and you'll see what I mean.
:cheers:
JDK

_________________
JD, father of Quinn, Son of a... Build Log
Quinn the Slotus:Ford 302 Powered, Mallock-Inspired, Tube Frame, Hillclimb Special
"Gonzo and friends: Last night must have been quite a night. Camelot moments, mechanical marvels, Rustoleum launches, flying squirrels, fru-fru tea cuppers, V8 envy, Ensure catch cans -- and it wasn't even a full moon." -- SeattleTom


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
POWERED_BY