LocostUSA.com
http://www.locostusa.com/forums/

Locofinn's Dmod Seven
http://www.locostusa.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=3356
Page 5 of 27

Author:  Glen [ March 3, 2009, 2:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Locofinn's Dmod Seven

Perhaps it's not a spherical bearing, but a solid "rod eye" or whatever you call them? If it's not one of those already it could be, although there would be some bending/buckling load on it's shank that's not desireable.

Author:  KB58 [ March 3, 2009, 2:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Locofinn's Dmod Seven

But then it'll bind in bump/droop...

Author:  pmatolcsy [ March 3, 2009, 2:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Locofinn's Dmod Seven

If the Forward LCA is perpendicular to the frame and you replace either the shock end or the inboard heim with a solid bushing, it should work fine then. Or you could replace the outboard hiem on the rear lca with a plate and clevis simular to the one on the upper arm.
Phil

Author:  KB58 [ March 3, 2009, 3:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Locofinn's Dmod Seven

True, but nothing in our cars are truly rigid - everything's compliant to some degree.

Author:  killernoodle [ March 3, 2009, 4:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Locofinn's Dmod Seven

KB58 wrote:
But then it'll bind in bump/droop...


Not if its only the link under the shock mount thats a solid rod end. In that case it should be fine.

Author:  nocones [ March 3, 2009, 4:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Locofinn's Dmod Seven

I'm pretty sure the link under the arm that runs toward the rear is attached with a solid joint to resist twist. Also the shocks would contribute greatly to the stiffness of the assembly as the reasonably solid bushing on the bottom wont like to twist in that direction to much. He did state that this is Off the shelf circle track parts. Which makes me think they work acceptably.

Daniel

Author:  Miatav8,MstrASE,A&P,F [ March 3, 2009, 4:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Locofinn's Dmod Seven

It looks like he is using these:

http://www.speedwaymotors.com/Steel-Rod ... ,1534.html

If so, nicely done! It would be tough to get it any lighter than this. It looks a lot like a ford festiva/aspire suspension only much less bind.

Author:  locofinn [ March 4, 2009, 12:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Locofinn's Dmod Seven

Miatav8,MstrASE,A&P,F wrote:
It looks like he is using these:

http://www.speedwaymotors.com/Steel-Rod ... ,1534.html

If so, nicely done! It would be tough to get it any lighter than this. It looks a lot like a ford festiva/aspire suspension only much less bind.


Yes. This is an established design called a strut type LCA. Very common in much heavier asphalt stock cars. I carefully went through the full range of bump and droop and the lower spherical bearing, or any other component, remains free of binding.

This set up would not be recommended for a street application where significant wheel travel is desired or required. You might get away with it if you went with a ball joint in lieu of a spherical bearing at the lower upright mount. UB machine makes these using ball joints also!

I thought the assembly would work well in my specific application. It is a proven design and very light weight. I am sure if it can hold up to a V8 stock car requirement it is likely overkill for a 1080# lotus. All the components are available off the shelf from UB machine, Speedway, etc. This will help me in getting replacement parts even when I am traveling. As long as UPS delivers there, I can get replacement shipped overnight!

The cost is fairly Locost too. The lower control arm unit is only about $50, powder coated, and well constructed.

Author:  locofinn [ March 15, 2009, 8:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Locofinn's Dmod Seven

After 3 trys and 2 weeks I finally got the front suspension control arms figured out. I revised the LCA fron the trailing strut to a leading strut. I get more more than enough bump and droop and the camber gain is not significant with the new layout.

The only thing is I wish I had is a narrower overall width. With 13"x10" wide wheels and only 2" backspace all dictated by the chosen Mustang II spindle and 10" brake rotor squeezed by only 13" diameter wheels, it was the best I could do. I could go with narrower wheels and tires but I may go with a smaller spindle and brake rotor somday. A larger diameter wheel would greatly increase my tire budget and change all the gearing. Need to keep the tire diameter small to heat up the Hoosiers quicker on a 60 sec autocross run.

Everything is a compromise.

Attachments:
3-15-09 RF1.jpg
3-15-09 RF1.jpg [ 124.76 KiB | Viewed 5536 times ]
3-15-09 RF2.jpg
3-15-09 RF2.jpg [ 105.83 KiB | Viewed 5537 times ]
3-15-09 RF3.jpg
3-15-09 RF3.jpg [ 112.26 KiB | Viewed 5538 times ]
3-15-09 RF4.jpg
3-15-09 RF4.jpg [ 104.59 KiB | Viewed 5534 times ]

Author:  SkinnyG [ March 15, 2009, 9:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Locofinn's Dmod Seven

That looks like a lot of scrub right there. I hope you've got pipes - my chicken wing arms had a hard enough time with my 13x10's, and I have 5" backspacing.....

G

Author:  modernbeat [ March 15, 2009, 10:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Locofinn's Dmod Seven

When I read that you decided to go with Mustang II spindles over the Fiero spindles I figured we'd see something like that.

Here's what you could have had with Fiero/Chevette spindles. The wheels are 13x10 and there's a 1" spacer behind them.

Image

Author:  Blackbird [ March 15, 2009, 10:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Locofinn's Dmod Seven

SkinnyG wrote:
That looks like a lot of scrub right there. I hope you've got pipes - my chicken wing arms had a hard enough time with my 13x10's, and I have 5" backspacing.....

G

I thought guns aren't allowed on SCCA events :?

Moti :lol:

Author:  locofinn [ May 10, 2009, 5:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Locofinn's Dmod Seven

I haven't posted in a while with Solo season starting but I managed to get the final front suspension design complete with steering system rough layout. Everything is fitting nicely with no suprises so far. It helped a lot to have a flat and square build table and measure everything twice before cut and weld. The chassis is off the build table for good at this point. Should have it rolling with a painted chassis mid summer latest. 8)

Attachments:
Locost 5-9-09 001sm.jpg
Locost 5-9-09 001sm.jpg [ 128.56 KiB | Viewed 5156 times ]
Locost 5-9-09 012sm.jpg
Locost 5-9-09 012sm.jpg [ 114.41 KiB | Viewed 5157 times ]
Locost 5-9-09 006sm.jpg
Locost 5-9-09 006sm.jpg [ 120.51 KiB | Viewed 5154 times ]

Author:  rx7locost [ May 11, 2009, 6:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Locofinn's Dmod Seven

You are making good progress. I like the addition of the cross piece between the upper spring mounts. It should counter the twist that would otherwise be there with such a large lever arm.

How did you fit the oil cooler? I am struggling with mounting mine. It is tight. Too far forward and there is not enough width. Too far back and you are into the waterpump pulley. Maybe the 12A oil cooler is just a bit shorter than my 13B cooler.

Chuck

Author:  locofinn [ May 12, 2009, 8:15 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Locofinn's Dmod Seven

Chuck, Keep in mind my motor set back several more inches to the rear than yours. As you can see from the photos I have plenty of room for the cooler to be suspended from the top frame rail. It is just resting there for now to make sure I cleared the steering components. I will have some sort of suspended bushing mounts to attached it. I have plenty of room to mount a couple of small fans to the cooler also. Having the oil cooler away from the radiator and motor should help with keeping things cool a possible. I am also planning significant engine bay exhaust side vents similar to what Jeff Underwood did on his BEC Locost.

Attachments:
Locost 5-9-09 010sm.jpg
Locost 5-9-09 010sm.jpg [ 133.7 KiB | Viewed 4902 times ]
Locost 5-9-09 005sm.jpg
Locost 5-9-09 005sm.jpg [ 133.06 KiB | Viewed 4909 times ]

Page 5 of 27 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/