LocostUSA.com

Learning how to build Lotus Seven replicas...together!
It is currently March 28, 2024, 4:41 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2887 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 ... 193  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: June 3, 2012, 5:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: October 24, 2008, 2:13 pm
Posts: 5326
Location: Carlsbad, California, USA
Open mouth, insert foot. Isn't that the way of it? I figured it out my own stupid self because "necessity is the mother of invention" and I wanted to put this problem to bed ASAP even though I could let it slide for a while.

First, I moved my welding table so it was situated under a really bright spotlight near the bandsaw and positioned it to illuminate the area to be welded. It is surprisingly hard to see in those narrow spaces when the torch is arcing. I though the really bright, focused spotlight would help and it did.

Second, I clamped the tunnel bottom (the part) vertically off the side of the welding table so the joint to be welded was at the bottom of the Vee and gravity would take molten metal down to it naturally.

Third, I kept the MIG nozzle on this time, but gave the filler wire out about 1/2" of stick out.

Fourth, I made two small beads just above the joint and let them slough off and flow towards the Vee joint. That left a wider gap to fill, but it was more accessible than the original even with the nozzle attached.

Last, I ran a new bead in between the two smaller ones and let the wire and molten go down between them and just kept feeding wire, moving it side to side, and letting it melt until the gap filled up. The result is a sort of "super fillet." It's more filler material and more actual fillet than necessary to join the pieces, but it got the job done. They are definitely stuck together.

I flipped the part 180 degrees and did the two on the other side in the same way. I won't use a narrow angle like that again unless it is an absolute necessity.

So, now on to the next problem.

Cheers,

_________________
Damn! That front slip angle is way too large and the Ackerman is just a muddle.

Build Log: viewtopic.php?f=35&t=5886


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: June 3, 2012, 5:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: May 7, 2011, 8:39 pm
Posts: 512
Location: new zealand
Hi Lonnie..nice people mover..Reds always faster..i always use stick for acute welds,low setting with the right rods..probably because i dont own a mig.. :) My old boss taught me to arc weld on exhaust pipe :shock: so welding thin gauge steel isnt a problem

kiwi Dave

_________________
I USE TO HAVE AN OPEN MIND ..BUT MY BRAINS KEPT FALLING OUT


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: June 3, 2012, 6:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: October 24, 2008, 2:13 pm
Posts: 5326
Location: Carlsbad, California, USA
laserracer wrote:
Hi Lonnie..nice people mover..Reds always faster..i always use stick for acute welds,low setting with the right rods..probably because i dont own a mig.. :) My old boss taught me to arc weld on exhaust pipe :shock: so welding thin gauge steel isnt a problem

kiwi Dave


Red is always faster, isn't it? The local police here are rumored to agree with that statement.

I've done stick welding. It's the first process I learned in a recent welding class at a local college. Rod selection is everything in stick welding because it give you almost every characteristic: penetration, freeze rate, flux/shield, etc. I was motivated by not wanting to have to figure out which rod type and size to use in the fix of my problem because it's time consuming. That's why I gave MIG another shot, which worked out OK this time.

If I did a lot of these acute angle welds, I would definitely invest the time necessary to use stick welding in this situation.

Thanks for the info.

Regards,

Lonnie

_________________
Damn! That front slip angle is way too large and the Ackerman is just a muddle.

Build Log: viewtopic.php?f=35&t=5886


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: June 4, 2012, 12:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: April 19, 2012, 9:43 pm
Posts: 419
Location: Colorado
Just a thought, but have you considered using a small gusset in your acute corners? It wouldn't need to be big, 1/2" on each edge, but it would allow you to tie the inside edges of your tight corner together in a structural manner.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: June 4, 2012, 8:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: October 24, 2008, 2:13 pm
Posts: 5326
Location: Carlsbad, California, USA
esp42089 wrote:
Just a thought, but have you considered using a small gusset in your acute corners? It wouldn't need to be big, 1/2" on each edge, but it would allow you to tie the inside edges of your tight corner together in a structural manner.

I hadn't actually considered that. Do you mean taking the gusset all the way into the apex of the angle or running it shy? I could see where a gusset could be a substitute for welding the join itself if you ran it say 1/4" or more shy of the apex. That would prevent you from having to weld the narrowest part of the joint, which is the real problem. Is that what you mean?

Cheers,

_________________
Damn! That front slip angle is way too large and the Ackerman is just a muddle.

Build Log: viewtopic.php?f=35&t=5886


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: June 4, 2012, 5:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: February 20, 2009, 2:27 pm
Posts: 531
Location: Reno, Nv
This might be what He meant. This is what I did. I cut small wedge sections of square tubing and filled in the narrow area with them like this.


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
John - Slow and Steady. . . Well slow anyway
Build Loghttp://www.locostusa.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=6245


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: June 4, 2012, 5:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: July 17, 2008, 9:11 am
Posts: 6414
Location: West Chicago,IL
One other alternative is to cut 4 triangles and make shear panels on both sides. It is a bit more welding but the welding is easy access.

Me, I'd just poke the mig nozzle into the narrow angle as far as it will go and start at the far side and work toward outward to me. The MIG nozzle is at a very acute angle relative to the weld line, and your are welding a far distance from the nozzle but it seems to work for me.


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
Chuck.

“Any suspension will work if you don’t let it.” - Colin Chapman

Visit my ongoing MGB Rustoration log: over HERE

Or my Wankel powered Locost log : over HERE

And don't forget my Cushman Truckster resto Locostusa.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=17766


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: June 4, 2012, 9:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: October 19, 2009, 9:36 pm
Posts: 2199
Location: meadview arizona
you could get a nozzle for the mig and flatten it a bit if you were that worried.

i used to have mig nozzles with bits cut out of the end for doing plug welds so you could apply pressure to the top material to hold it down with the nozzle, and a flat one for doing just what you needed there.

keep the nozzle clean though or it will ground out and the weld won't be where you want it.

_________________
this story shall the good man teach his son,
and chrispin chrispian shall ne'er go by,
from this day to the end of the world.
but we in it shall be remembered.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: June 4, 2012, 10:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: April 19, 2012, 9:43 pm
Posts: 419
Location: Colorado
MYTF wrote:
This might be what He meant. This is what I did. I cut small wedge sections of square tubing and filled in the narrow area with them like this.


That is exactly what I meant, thanks for taking the time to mock it up on a photo! It would allow you to strengthen up the inside of the joint considerably, weigh little more than welding the inside seam (if you managed to), and in my eyes still look presentable.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: June 4, 2012, 10:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: October 24, 2008, 2:13 pm
Posts: 5326
Location: Carlsbad, California, USA
I like the wedge approach esp42089/MYTF suggested. That looks strong and pretty do-able.

I think the area in question looks bigger in the photo I posted than it is in real life. I don't think even flattening the nozzle would help much in my case.

When I did lay the two smaller beads above the apex, I could use the extended wire technique. Before that, I tried welding at the apex in the narrow Vee with the extended wire approach Chuck suggested, but it acted like a cutting torch on the far side, melting off the end of a tube. I fixed that pretty easy because it was at the very end and accessible.

If I can, I'll avoid such sharp angles in the future. If I can't, then next time I'll try the "little wedges" approach.

Thanks to all who made suggestions. It's much appreciated.

Cheers,

_________________
Damn! That front slip angle is way too large and the Ackerman is just a muddle.

Build Log: viewtopic.php?f=35&t=5886


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: June 4, 2012, 10:56 pm 
Offline
We are Slotus!
User avatar

Joined: October 6, 2009, 9:29 am
Posts: 7651
Location: Tallahassee, FL (The Center of the Known Universe)
See! Told ya iffen we waited around a minute or two the Smart People would figure it out! :mrgreen: Ain't that a great plan? Works every time! :mrgreen:

:cheers:

_________________
JD, father of Quinn, Son of a... Build Log
Quinn the Slotus:Ford 302 Powered, Mallock-Inspired, Tube Frame, Hillclimb Special
"Gonzo and friends: Last night must have been quite a night. Camelot moments, mechanical marvels, Rustoleum launches, flying squirrels, fru-fru tea cuppers, V8 envy, Ensure catch cans -- and it wasn't even a full moon." -- SeattleTom


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: June 5, 2012, 12:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: October 24, 2008, 2:13 pm
Posts: 5326
Location: Carlsbad, California, USA
GonzoRacer wrote:
See! Told ya iffen we waited around a minute or two the Smart People would figure it out! :mrgreen: Ain't that a great plan? Works every time! :mrgreen:

:cheers:

Amen!

_________________
Damn! That front slip angle is way too large and the Ackerman is just a muddle.

Build Log: viewtopic.php?f=35&t=5886


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: June 7, 2012, 7:52 am 
Offline

Joined: March 18, 2010, 5:20 am
Posts: 86
Location: New Zealand
To weld those acute inside angles you can do as suggested and flatten a nozzle a little and also shorten it. You will still have a longer wire stick out though so to compensate you may need to bump the current a little. It also helps to increase the gas flow. If you start in the middle and weld out then the longest you have to reach is a little over 1/2 an inch. I know that you are welding the wrong way ie. pulling the torch as apposed to pushing it but it is only thin material and you will get away with it. I hope you will forgive me for saying, but some of your welds look a little cold and I would try a little more current with the same wire speed or viciversa a little less wire speed but the same current.
Bruce


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: June 7, 2012, 10:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: October 24, 2008, 2:13 pm
Posts: 5326
Location: Carlsbad, California, USA
nisseven wrote:
To weld those acute inside angles you can do as suggested and flatten a nozzle a little and also shorten it. You will still have a longer wire stick out though so to compensate you may need to bump the current a little. It also helps to increase the gas flow. If you start in the middle and weld out then the longest you have to reach is a little over 1/2 an inch. I know that you are welding the wrong way ie. pulling the torch as apposed to pushing it but it is only thin material and you will get away with it. I hope you will forgive me for saying, but some of your welds look a little cold and I would try a little more current with the same wire speed or viciversa a little less wire speed but the same current.
Bruce


Thanks for the response, Bruce.

All this welding stuff is more complicated that one first suspects, isn't it? I know my welds on this piece do look a little mounded, but I've done a good amount of testing on scrap pieces of 0.75" x 16 Ga. RHS (as in this part) where I can see the underside of the weld on the tubing scraps. The penetration is just about ideal and I can see the metal just beginning to pucker right at the underside of the join with clear discoloration from the arc heat, so it should have fused together. If I up the current, it starts to sag underneath, which I know isn't good. I don't know why the bead isn't flatter. Too much filler wire maybe? Maybe it's something to do with my personal welding style like moving too slow?

My welder has "auto selections" based on the thickness of the material, but I've found it is too hot for my welding style and I see too much sagging on the underside of the welds consistently.

I do use a push, though. That's how I blasted off the corner of one tube when I was trying long stick-out in the acute weld. The low angle of the filler wire just pushed it right off when it got molten rather than fused to it. From my testing on scrap, I do have a "cheat sheet" of settings for various material types and thicknesses that should give good, strong welds even if they're not too pretty.

It would be great if I had the benefit of years of experience welding before taking the chassis on as a project. In that case, I would be anticipating these issues and solving the problems in real time as they arise, or better yet, avoiding them all together. Unfortunately, that's not the case. Every day is a new adventure! That's what it's great to have a resource like LocostUSA.

I tell you, this experience has amplified my already appreciable respect for people who make things, especially race cars. But, I'm like that musician who wants to go to Carnegie Hall, so for me it's practice, practice, practice. :lol:

Thanks again,

Lonnie

_________________
Damn! That front slip angle is way too large and the Ackerman is just a muddle.

Build Log: viewtopic.php?f=35&t=5886


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: June 7, 2012, 10:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: July 4, 2006, 5:40 pm
Posts: 1994
Location: Novato, CA
The Locost is my first major welding project, so I'm no expert, but I got a lot of help from watching videos. One thing I learned early on is that the technique of working the torch back and forth across the seam, with a slight pause at the end points, really works for me. It makes a solid weld and a nice bead to boot, and that's using the autoset feature. My early beads looked kind of narrow and lumpy.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2887 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 ... 193  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
POWERED_BY