LocostUSA.com

This is a really unique build, I've always thought about building something similar, definitely gonna follow it!

_________________
--Eric

"Stuckness shouldn't be avoided. It's the psychic predecessor of all real understanding." --Robert Pirsig

Grey 2019 Hyundai Veloster Turbo
Red 1989 BMW 325is

No, I'm not dead, but I took quite a few months off from the project while it was too cold in the unheated barn to work through the winter. Now that it's starting to get a bit warmer, I guess I have no more excuses not to start working on it again.

Here is a picture of the front left lower wishbone, with all of the triangulation stiffening bars added. "Dummy" shock in place for now until I figure out what spring rates to get for the QA1's.

_________________
Photo gallery of my completed Locost:
https://plus.google.com/photos/10397358 ... banner=pwa

Welcome back, mainlandboy! Man, I've missed following your build for nigh on six months. Please stick with it and keep us updated; this car is so cool.

And now for some Monday morning quarterbacking: your brace on the LCA takes care of the serious worry (that braking forces would fold the LBJ carrying channel aft, where the big hole is) and the overall coolness of the dropped shock mount made that hole well worth the trouble of external bracing, but I'm puzzled about the placement of that brace.

Was there a wheel (or tire) clearance issue that led you to put the brace tube (the one with the red arrow pointing to it below)......so far forward? Could the south end of that tube (marked with the green arrow) been attached further south (more toward the rear bushing) without the tire hitting it at full left steering lock?

PS--even if you say, "Yeah, that's a good idea," don't do it! This is a car that should be on the road ASAP.

_________________
Locost builder and adventurer, and founder (but no longer owner) of Kinetic Vehicles

Hi Jack,

Thanks for your comments! It would have been much easier to place the lower shock mount on top of the LCA like what is done on most Locosts, but that would have forced the upper shock mount to be higher than what looked aesthetically pleasing.

Regarding the placement of the brace you pointed to with the red arrow, your assumption of why it doesn't intersect the main tube further back is exactly correct. The point marked by the green arrow was as far back as this brace could intersect the main LCA tube to allow just enough clearance between the tire and this brace under full steering lock. Wheel offset and width come into play here, so I made sure to have the intended wheels/tires installed before I made this brace.

Cheers,
Mark

_________________
Photo gallery of my completed Locost:
https://plus.google.com/photos/10397358 ... banner=pwa

Or move the south-end inboard pickup forward so that it's a straight shot by the brace tube. That additional width of the lower A-arm doesn't improve the strength because it'll flex at the green arrow.

_________________
Midlana book: Build this mid-engine Locost!, http://midlana.com/stuff/book/
Kimini book: Designing mid-engine cars using FWD drivetrains
Both available from https://www.lulu.com/

Indeed you have. I'm wondering what tubes (dimensions and wall thickness) you've used on this chassis. And have you put the chassis on the scale yet? I don't want to slow down your build by asking too many questions, but inquiring minds want to know...

_________________
Locost builder and adventurer, and founder (but no longer owner) of Kinetic Vehicles

It is tough to build an lca as good as the oem when trying to duplicate the oem attachments for interchangeability.
There are several companies making them for miatas but they are not nearly as light as the oem arms.

_________________
Miata UBJ: ES-2074R('70s maz pickup)
Ford IFS viewtopic.php?f=5&t=13225&p=134742
Simple Spring select viewtopic.php?f=5&t=11815
LxWxHt
360LA 442E: 134.5x46x15
Lotus7:115x39x7.25
Tiger Avon:114x40x13.3-12.6
Champion/Book:114x42x11
Gibbs/Haynes:122x42x14
VoDou:113x44x14
McSorley 442:122x46x14
Collins 241:127x46x12

Ain't that the truth, Mv8. Particularly for Miatas, which adjut their alignment via moving the lca chassis attachment bushings with eccentric bolt thingies.

_________________
Locost builder and adventurer, and founder (but no longer owner) of Kinetic Vehicles

The potential issue with this is that because of the flex (although small) in the suspension bushings, moving the lower inboard pickup points closer together will increase the fore/aft movement at the wheel under braking, even if the LCA is super stiff:



If the lower inboard pickup points are too close together, an additional strut brace would be needed anyway, as is the case in some production cars that have an additional link connecting the outer end of the LCA forward to the body to prevent fore/aft movement of the LCA.

Mark

_________________
Photo gallery of my completed Locost:
https://plus.google.com/photos/10397358 ... banner=pwa

Hi Jack, the frame rails (including the kicked up section in the back) are made from 2 X 3 X 1/8 wall ERW. This car is going to be a bit of a porker compared to my Locost, but that's okay. This car serves a different purpose.

_________________
Photo gallery of my completed Locost:
https://plus.google.com/photos/10397358 ... banner=pwa

Thanks for the info. That's pretty much the traditional modern hod rod chassis stuff; I was wondering if you'd maybe figured the car would be enough lighter with the Miata driveline than the 'Murrican V8 to go for 14 or 12 gauge (.083 or .109) instead of 11 gauge (.125). And I hear you the different purpose; it's sure no further off the beaten Locost track than, say, me getting into ultramilage.

Man, I'm sure glad you're logging your build here so I don't have to check out HAMB every day.

_________________
Locost builder and adventurer, and founder (but no longer owner) of Kinetic Vehicles

I temporarily attached some cardboard pieces to the side of the chassis to get an idea of how the body will look. Note the ornate Sharpie marker door handle.

_________________
Photo gallery of my completed Locost:
https://plus.google.com/photos/10397358 ... banner=pwa

That is going to be terrific!

_________________
K0RKK 146.460
spearfishcreek.net
Royce

I'm only checking in to say that I'm enjoying following this build, and it's nice that you're back to posting on it.. I'm with you on working in the cold; not fun

Also wanted to say thanks for taking the time to post part numbers and where you sourced them... makes it super easy for the next guy that needs that bit to go hunt it down..

Keep at it.. you build at a brisk pace, and it's fun to watch your progress


--ccrunner

_________________
Dean

1972 Honda N600 Restomod "ccrunner's N600 VFR800 repower"

1963 Volvo P1800 Restomod
http://locostusa.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=16309

1959 Berkeley SE492 Restomod...
viewtopic.php?f=36&t=19397

"ccrunner's 1960 MGA coupe Restomod" found on MGExp.com

I like how you frenched the door handles. Very smooth.

mainlandboy, I PMed and emailed you a couple questions, but other folks here who are considering using Miata rear subframes may be curious too, so here they are again:

There are two rows of three bolts holding the Miata rear subframe to the chassis. How far apart are those rows (the right row and the left row) from each other? Also, how far are the forward holes of those rows forward from the axle? And how far are the front hole from the back holes? And while we're at it, how high is the top of the subframe (where it bolts to your chassis) from the bottom of your chassis?

I'm not home right now or I'd measure one myself.

I'm loving your build. Your willingness to start afresh on the chassis was brilliant.

Regards, Jack

_________________
Locost builder and adventurer, and founder (but no longer owner) of Kinetic Vehicles