Miatav8,MstrASE,A&P,F wrote:
Nice work. Thanks for sharing.
I was impressed with the amount of interior room for such a small car.
I'm sure you've been asked this before, but why not a Tiger replica with a destroked efi 5.0L? I do see the benefit of using an engine that has enough clearance to fit good manifolds. The Tiger had access holes under the dash for the rear spark plugs and the aircleaner is half covered by the cowl.
Any suspension plans?
IRS?
Well, first off, after going to all the trouble to install a 5.0, why destroke? But simply put, a V8 Alpine does not interest me. You have to completely trash the Alpine steering gear and install a front mount R&P. The Alpine front end is such that it does not take kindly to front mounted R&P, it results in the Ackerman being bass akwards. That is particularly true with the stock Tiger. In addition, I like to drive a car with an engine that needs to be whupped on to really produce good performance. LOTS more fun.
No suspension plans. This car is intended to be a long distance tourer (later Alpines have huge trunks), so Locost type performance is not on the "must" list. Here is a rundown on the car, either as is or soon will be:
Ranger M5 trans with Ford 8" rear, 3.55 gears. Makes for a tall 5th gear.
Front brakes, combination of Grand Prix 10.5" rotors and GM "Metric" calipers.
Rear brakes, 90's Saturn disc.
Master cylinder, Datsun F10, 3/4" piston (dual system). Stops great.
Old Air, in dash air conditioning and heater.
2.3 Duratec.
All of the above is reality, except of course, for the Duratec. It currently has a N/A Pinto 2.0, started out with a turbo, but had to remove it for reasons not pertinent to this post. The M5 and 3.55 rear is too much for the Pinto, especially in N/A form. I think the 2.3 will handle it a lot better.
Ted, that's interesting info, but I doubt that I'll be needing that TB. Doing some math, I found the volume of my runners is about 2/3 that of the stock intake and my log is smaller. To top it off, my TB (Contour 2.5, 50 mm.) is smaller than the stock 2.3! So low end performance should be pretty good. It's the top end I'm wondering about.
Bill