oldejack wrote:
First. ... Is the originally welded surface of the bracket laying horizontal in the provided picture while its "normal" position to have the rear (welded) face vertical?
It appears to me from the picture that this is the case which would make the a.moore's statement "Several builders have made mounts that are welded on the front and rear faces of the tube. The welds end up being in shear and the greater weld area helps to distribute the load. It also helps if the welds end on the edge of the tube since it feeds into the tube's sides rather than a perpendicular face. Plus you can size the bracket to increase the weld area." of greater import.
Putting the applied loads into a weld joint rather than the base metal (the chassis tube) focuses the applied forces on the welds themselves which are, by their nature, less resistant to fatigue than the parent metal.
2nd. .. The weld line directly underneath the green arrow looks suspiciously like it had rather poor penetration into the host material (the chassis tubes).
I suspect an incorrect penetration angle rather than a "cold joint" from what I see in the picture.
It may be something as simple as your physical access to the chassis making it difficult to hold yourself in the right position to get good access to the joint which would explain why it happens on one side but not the other.
3rd and probably the least telling. .. is this the front or rear tube of the control arm and is this leg of the control arm perpendicular to the chassis or at an angle?
Edit>>> you answered one half already, I just failed to note it. .. front LCA/rear mounting point.
Normally a suspension pickup should have no problems with force application you describe as "going in and out of the driveway", I rather suspect that this is actually when the loads occurs slowly enough that you can see the results.
In my opinion hitting a pothole at speed has a much greater potential for catastrophic failures by creating momentary point overloads well beyond the response rate of the suspension.
Typical loading of that weld is down and apart (in tension) at an angle shallower than the shock's included angle. .. imagine the lower shock mount as the pivot with the load pushing up on the lower ball joint.
The fact that the pivot moves during suspension travel doesn't change the length of the levers involved, it only lessens the applied load since some portion of load is absorbed by the spring.
Out of curiosity, what sort of potholes do you grow in your area? Out here they're the size of Yugo's and if, like most people, you tend to cross them with your offside the issue may be a simple matter of repeat overloads but I rather doubt it.
I think SOME of the weld may have been cold, but I welded it on all four sides and you can see on the top weld that it ripped the metal right off.
I will double check for binding today and also look to make sure the jam nut is not hitting it in any way. Also to be clear it is mounted regular. In the photo the mount has fallen down to that position. That is NOT the position it is welded on the chassis.
I will go home and collect data and more photo's if necessary. I REALLY appreciate the feedback I am getting from you guys.
J. R.
_________________
Attention TURBO LOVERS, Great book ----->
How to turbocharge and Tune your EngineSold: GT30/71R My00 S2k
My Car: Custom Build Lotus Super 7