LocostUSA.com

Learning how to build Lotus Seven replicas...together!
It is currently April 18, 2024, 7:42 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: March 29, 2014, 5:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: January 1, 2014, 8:13 am
Posts: 12
Location: Chicago Ill
Hello forum!

Looking for some non Locost build info on control arm tubing sizes and wall thickness for a 2200lb tub based car with double wishbone front and rear suspension utilizing miata knuckles and suspension geometry (for the most part) RWD.

Figured I would pick your guys/gals heads to see what you think, after all the searching I do always ends up on this forum.

Heres what Im thinking.

All 4130
1" .083" lowers in rear
3/4" .083 uppers in rear
1/2" rod ends.

Any suggestions or input would be great.

Thanks, Scott.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: March 30, 2014, 11:05 am 
Offline
Automotive Encyclopedia
User avatar

Joined: December 22, 2006, 2:05 pm
Posts: 8044
I suggest dom, 1", 0.83" uca and lca with .125" strip for brackets and braces. Arrangement is just as important as wall and od. Arms should bend not break, and they should bend before the chassis does. No sudden changes in crossection.

_________________
Miata UBJ: ES-2074R('70s maz pickup)
Ford IFS viewtopic.php?f=5&t=13225&p=134742
Simple Spring select viewtopic.php?f=5&t=11815
LxWxHt
360LA 442E: 134.5x46x15
Lotus7:115x39x7.25
Tiger Avon:114x40x13.3-12.6
Champion/Book:114x42x11
Gibbs/Haynes:122x42x14
VoDou:113x44x14
McSorley 442:122x46x14
Collins 241:127x46x12


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: March 30, 2014, 11:46 am 
Offline

Joined: January 1, 2014, 8:13 am
Posts: 12
Location: Chicago Ill
Thanks for the response!

DOM it is then.

Scott.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: March 30, 2014, 12:35 pm 
Offline
Mid-Engined Maniac

Joined: April 23, 2006, 8:26 pm
Posts: 6419
Location: SoCal
Miatav8,MstrASE,A&P,F wrote:
I suggest dom, 1", 0.83" uca and lca with .125" strip for brackets and braces. Arrangement is just as important as wall and od. Arms should bend not break, and they should bend before the chassis does. No sudden changes in crossection.

Agree with ^

_________________
Midlana book: Build this mid-engine Locost!, http://midlana.com/stuff/book/
Kimini book: Designing mid-engine cars using FWD drivetrains
Both available from https://www.lulu.com/


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: March 31, 2014, 4:08 am 
Offline

Joined: November 9, 2012, 4:54 am
Posts: 104
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
I'm looking into the same info.
Is 1/2" rod-ends what is normally used on these type of cars?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: March 31, 2014, 8:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: July 17, 2008, 9:11 am
Posts: 6415
Location: West Chicago,IL
I went with the 1" x .083" tubing on mine for all 8 control arms. I think you could easily get by with 3/4" for the upper control arms. The uppers see less stress. However any very small gains in weight would not be seen unless you are racing at a national level.

All my rod ends are 1/2" except I used 5/8" for my upper outer in place of an upper ball joint. This was chosen based on Jack's testing and suggestions.

_________________
Chuck.

“Any suspension will work if you don’t let it.” - Colin Chapman

Visit my ongoing MGB Rustoration log: over HERE

Or my Wankel powered Locost log : over HERE

And don't forget my Cushman Truckster resto Locostusa.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=17766


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
POWERED_BY