Miatav8,MstrASE,A&P,F wrote:
The results are no loss of camber in roll,
I make mistakes too. Not sure where I got zero camber loss from; obviously not! I made the changes and posted that in about a minute. Camber gain is the same as yours without the static at .5/degree.
Using the graph, the lower/flatter the camber curves are in roll, the more gain there is in roll to combat the loss.
Putting the camber peaks on top of the rc height seems to work well.
The rc should be flat through the range of roll allowed by the spring rate and swaybar.
The instant center swing arm pivot (pink dot) should not cross the rc (green dot) at the maximum allowed roll angle.
This one was tweaked for a wider rack; it will have the same camber gain with half as much static, lower rc, and sa longer than 30 inches at 5 deg roll.
default values
_________________
Miata UBJ: ES-2074R('70s maz pickup)
Ford IFS
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=13225&p=134742Simple Spring select
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=11815LxWxHt
360LA 442E: 134.5x46x15
Lotus7:115x39x7.25
Tiger Avon:114x40x13.3-12.6
Champion/Book:114x42x11
Gibbs/Haynes:122x42x14
VoDou:113x44x14
McSorley 442:122x46x14
Collins 241:127x46x12