LocostUSA.com

.

I don't see any net gain/advantage to doing this. A fwd ifs donor can be repowered with a diff and a bike motor for less effort.

Custom gear sets for flipping a transaxle around the other way are very expensive and may not be available for future replacement.

If you wan to have fwd with the transaxle in front of the engine, take a vw bug type transaxle and build with it at the front with custom uprights or appropriate to the cv joint early vw fwd uprights.

The factory five came from a guy who built a one-off called the Blast. Only downside imho is the transmission sticks out past the rear wheels.

_________________
Miata UBJ: ES-2074R('70s maz pickup)
Ford IFS viewtopic.php?f=5&t=13225&p=134742
Simple Spring select viewtopic.php?f=5&t=11815
LxWxHt
360LA 442E: 134.5x46x15
Lotus7:115x39x7.25
Tiger Avon:114x40x13.3-12.6
Champion/Book:114x42x11
Gibbs/Haynes:122x42x14
VoDou:113x44x14
McSorley 442:122x46x14
Collins 241:127x46x12

.

I recall the subbie custom ring and pinion comes from Australia but I've not been following that very much. VW busses are in high demand by folks world wide with lots of cash so it might make sense for them.

The original vw transaxles for busses are strong but don't have many options for final gearing and only 4 speeds without overdrive. Original gearing is "farm tractor" low due to the power to weight of the busses. I had a '70s one.

Chris in PA can answer what that would be like. He used a vw engine up front with a torque tube (less interior space lost than using a driveshaft) and a porsche transaxle at the rear: viewtopic.php?f=35&t=13200

_________________
Miata UBJ: ES-2074R('70s maz pickup)
Ford IFS viewtopic.php?f=5&t=13225&p=134742
Simple Spring select viewtopic.php?f=5&t=11815
LxWxHt
360LA 442E: 134.5x46x15
Lotus7:115x39x7.25
Tiger Avon:114x40x13.3-12.6
Champion/Book:114x42x11
Gibbs/Haynes:122x42x14
VoDou:113x44x14
McSorley 442:122x46x14
Collins 241:127x46x12

.

It's been done at least twice that I can recall off the top of my head, here in the UK (I'm sure there are other examples that I can't bring to mind at present).

One was a car called the Brooke 245, which was a tandem 2-seater:





The other was a one-off special called the JNS, styled to look like an old Alfa Romeo Alfetta 159:





Both are based on old Renaut 5 components; both worked well (the Brooke 245 was sold in kit form and was reviewed favourably by the UK kit car press), and both obviously used the Renault drivetrain to take advantage of the fact that you could achieve a 'front mid-engined' layout without the need for a propshaft, so you could have a centrally seated driver sitting down low.

The Brooke was also offered as a 3-wheeler (and there were several other 3-wheelers - the Kindred Spirit and DRK come to mind - that used the same drivetrain)

dont forgot this

I'm not sure it qualifies as 'locost'!

Don't want to show my age but many, many years ago Jim Hall wrote an article or a series of articles on handling in either R&T or Car and Driver. He paid a lot of attention to slip angles and seem to demonstrate that RWD was the way to go if ultimate cornering speed was your goal. Not to say that a front-wheel drive (fwd or FWD?) locost wouldn't be fun, given big enough front tires. But suspension geometry would be critical. I'd suggest a front deDion axle but apparently Posie's (?) both-end deDion axle SCCA (CanAM?) sports racer suffered terribly from gyroscopically-induced bump steer. Maybe apocryphal, or simply bad memory, but a matter for caution.

_________________
Warren
Isuzu Pickup/SR20DE, +401 COLD frame
Build Log: viewtopic.php?f=35&t=11601