LocostUSA.com

Learning how to build Lotus Seven replicas...together!
It is currently May 13, 2024, 3:59 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: twin R1 engine idea...
PostPosted: September 13, 2014, 10:20 am 
Offline

Joined: November 4, 2011, 7:22 am
Posts: 77
So i'm an F1 fanatic and would love to build a locost f1 look alike and i'm playing with a few ideas. My most feasible one is this.

Use twin R1 engines to get roughly 320 screaming hp and utilize two shifters linked together the way Zcars does them. I'm not the first to think about doing this but I cant find anything on the way I want to orient the motors. Below you can see a quick drawing on the engine layout. I may have enough room to place them side by side and not have to stagger them. I know they are roughly 18" wide.

My plan is to transmit the power from each motor to a common jack shaft. The jackshaft will then have a central sprocket that will chain drive the differential. Can you tell me what I'm missing to make this potentially work? I know the shifting will be tricky but its been done many times before. any issues using a common jackshaft?


Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: September 13, 2014, 10:45 am 
Offline
Mid-Engined Maniac

Joined: April 23, 2006, 8:26 pm
Posts: 6422
Location: SoCal
Do you have extensive composite experience? That'll make the engine work seem trivial by comparison.

_________________
Midlana book: Build this mid-engine Locost!, http://midlana.com/stuff/book/
Kimini book: Designing mid-engine cars using FWD drivetrains
Both available from https://www.lulu.com/


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: September 13, 2014, 11:06 am 
Offline

Joined: November 4, 2011, 7:22 am
Posts: 77
KB58 wrote:
Do you have extensive composite experience? That'll make the engine work seem trivial by comparison.


Not on a large scale like this but I have carbon composite wet layup experience and foam shaping. this would be a fun/possible track day car build. I'm weighing the single engine turbo / dual engine. idea. Problem is I want to run 15" wheels, 335ish rear tires and 305 fronts to look F1 ish... so i need the power.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: September 13, 2014, 11:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: April 12, 2010, 5:40 pm
Posts: 2081
Location: san francisco bay area
Don't forget to take gear ratios and tire size into account, stock tire size for the R1 is 24.5" and the final drive ratio is 2.6875/1.
Using a bike gearbox means you'll have a tall first gear and really closely spaced gears. ..

_________________
"There are times when a broken tool is better than a sound one, or a twisted personality more useful than a whole one.
For instance, a whole beer bottle isn't half the weapon that half a beer bottle is ..." Randall Garrett


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: September 13, 2014, 11:56 am 
Offline

Joined: February 8, 2014, 10:47 pm
Posts: 781
Location: Cornelius OR
You need a way of insuring the transmissions are both in the same gear.

Chains are scary, turn the motors sideways and use a shaft, short chains to a single drive shaft?

Hyabusa V8 has already been done that would be an awesome choice.

Image

_________________
Honey anyone?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: September 13, 2014, 12:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: August 19, 2014, 5:17 pm
Posts: 685
Location: England
I always liked the look of the ox series yamaha engine which I think is derived from a outboard. Some of these boat engines are really small ,super powerful, rev and are extremely light. To get your head round how small they are that is a 7"1/4 clutch hanging on the back of the engine.

Bob

Image

And they did a V8

Attachment:
url.jpg


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
Build Log viewtopic.php?f=35&t=16640&p=187700#p187700

Mancave http://s1116.photobucket.com/user/mypic ... ow/mancave


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: September 15, 2014, 1:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: July 29, 2006, 9:10 pm
Posts: 3169
Location: Oregon, usually
kingkyle wrote:
My plan is to transmit the power from each motor to a common jack shaft. The jackshaft will then have a central sprocket that will chain drive the differential.
How about no jackshaft? If each engine drove one wheel, you wouldn't need a diff and the drive package would be simpler/lighter/cheaper to build.

_________________
Locost builder and adventurer, and founder (but no longer owner) of Kinetic Vehicles


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: September 15, 2014, 2:49 pm 
Offline
Mid-Engined Maniac

Joined: April 23, 2006, 8:26 pm
Posts: 6422
Location: SoCal
JackMcCornack wrote:
How about no jackshaft? If each engine drove one wheel, you wouldn't need a diff and the drive package would be simpler/lighter/cheaper to build.

By individually applying gas and brakes, and having swival wheels up front, you could save even more weight by not having a steering wheel or rack!

_________________
Midlana book: Build this mid-engine Locost!, http://midlana.com/stuff/book/
Kimini book: Designing mid-engine cars using FWD drivetrains
Both available from https://www.lulu.com/


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: September 15, 2014, 3:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: September 19, 2009, 12:33 pm
Posts: 498
KB58 wrote:
By individually applying gas and brakes, and having swival wheels up front, you could save even more weight by not having a steering wheel or rack!


:lol:

_________________
Ford 5.0 into an M3
mikaelvroom.com | @MikaelVroom


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: September 15, 2014, 3:19 pm 
Offline
Toyotaphobe
User avatar

Joined: April 5, 2008, 2:25 am
Posts: 4829
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
KB58 wrote:
JackMcCornack wrote:
How about no jackshaft? If each engine drove one wheel, you wouldn't need a diff and the drive package would be simpler/lighter/cheaper to build.

By individually applying gas and brakes, and having swival wheels up front, you could save even more weight by not having a steering wheel or rack!



My zero turn mower does that and I've many times tried to figure out a way to transfer this to an autocross car. I don't think it's viable for the street, but I'll bet it would be killer on a tighter autocross course.

_________________
mobilito ergo sum
I drive therefore I am

I can explain it to you,
but I can't understand it for you.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: September 15, 2014, 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: December 7, 2012, 8:28 am
Posts: 1410
Location: Sarasota
I heard about a GoKart that beat everyone by having two engines one per wheel. You can set it up so that when you corner the outside wheel spins faster then the inside. No need for an LSD then you have independent power. You could set something up that relates to the steering and adds more power to the outside wheel. The tighter you turn the bigger the difference.

_________________
2015 & 2016 EMod Florida State Autocross Champion
2013 & 2014 DSP Florida State Autocross Champion

Scrap Metal Build Log viewtopic.php?f=35&t=14558


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: September 15, 2014, 3:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: June 12, 2012, 8:40 pm
Posts: 475
Location: Mount Airy, NC
carguy123 wrote:
My zero turn mower does that and I've many times tried to figure out a way to transfer this to an autocross car. I don't think it's viable for the street, but I'll bet it would be killer on a tighter autocross course.


Ya know, what sounds like a monumentally ridiculous idea has possibilities in this computer everywhere world. My wife's BMW used various sensors to determine if the car was sliding and would apply the individual brakes to straighten it out. When I was setting up the fuel maps for my Locost ECU I got a lesson in how the computer read inputs and directed the injectors. If you used a steering column and pedal assembly from a car that was drive by wire, sent the output to a computer which controlled both motors....

_________________
My car viewtopic.php?f=37&t=16434
1930s Style Sports Car viewtopic.php?f=36&t=16888


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: September 15, 2014, 4:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: November 4, 2011, 7:22 am
Posts: 77
The simple method would be connecting one engine directly to a driveshaft with an adaptor. then the second engine would connect to the drive shaft via chain. This way I can use a standard torsen diff. As long as the driveshaft is steel I can weld a sprocket to it.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: September 24, 2014, 12:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: August 12, 2012, 6:38 pm
Posts: 1937
Location: worcester county, Massachsetts
wrightcomputing wrote:
You can set it up so that when you corner the outside wheel spins faster then the inside.


you don't have to set up anything, really, that's what happens anyway when you turn. outside wheel describes a larger radius arc, adn thus turns faster than the inside wheel. the drag of the tire on the street will cause the engines to spin at different rpm.

_________________
The B-3 build log: http://www.locostusa.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=13941 unfortunately, all the pictures were lost in the massive server crash

The beginnings of the Jag Special,
https://www.locostusa.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=19012
Again, all pictures were lost.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: September 24, 2014, 1:00 pm 
Offline
Toyotaphobe
User avatar

Joined: April 5, 2008, 2:25 am
Posts: 4829
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
robbovius wrote:
wrightcomputing wrote:
You can set it up so that when you corner the outside wheel spins faster then the inside.


you don't have to set up anything, really, that's what happens anyway when you turn. outside wheel describes a larger radius arc, adn thus turns faster than the inside wheel. the drag of the tire on the street will cause the engines to spin at different rpm.



It can't be that simple can it?

But if you were to be able to apply more power to the outside wheel you could decrease your radius. That's what some of the active systems do nowadays.

_________________
mobilito ergo sum
I drive therefore I am

I can explain it to you,
but I can't understand it for you.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
POWERED_BY