I think you missed the jist of what I was saying. I think building a locost from scratch would be easier because:
You are starting with a clean piece of paper,
you are following a road well travelled and well documented for the most part,
you are working with mostly new materials top to bottom,
you aren't working around an unknown (except to retired Bavarian engineers) form factor.
The flip side of my Locost building positives are as follows:
Welding to a unibody sucks, even with a new car with all the paint, corrosion inhibiting coatings and sound deadeners. It sucks ten times as bad when you grind off that paint/tar/undercoating and find nothing to weld to but rust.
You refer to the 30 year old suspension design as if it is inadequate simply because it's 30 years old. Things have come a long way, but BMW was not exactly on the tail end of the curve for when it came to producing well handling cars, even 30 years ago. The lotus design we all strive to reproduce (and often fail to replicate) predates that 30 year old design by a decade or two. We went to the moon over 18 years before your car was built, that doesn't mean you could do it better. Just because they didn't have solidworks and FEA doesn't mean that they couldn't do great things. Not trying to be a wiseass here, I just don't want you to minimize the task you are undertaking.
You are alone in the woods on this. Not many forums to go to compare build plans or seek help when you're doing something this unique.
However if you do choose to do it and you stick with it through the trials and tribulations that will come with it and do a good job it may be worthwhile. (but maybe only to you- it won't make you rich selling suspension kits the cars are too rare or successful as a racer since it likely won't fit any class rules) Either way just don't expect it to be easier than building a Locost.