A Strictly Touring 1984 V6 ranger based Locost 7

Tell us about your project and keep us up to date.

Moderators: a.moore, JackMcCornack

Post Reply
User avatar
carguy123
Toyotaphobe
Posts: 4829
Joined: April 5, 2008, 2:25 am
Building: Choppercrosser
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

Re: A Strictly Touring 1984 V6 ranger based Locost 7

Post by carguy123 »

Is the Cologne engine the little V4 that came in snowmobiles, SAAB Sonett, etc.?
mobilito ergo sum
I drive therefore I am

I can explain it to you,
but I can't understand it for you.
Off Road SHO
Posts: 1047
Joined: July 6, 2008, 11:15 am
Building: Yamaha V-6 powered s
Location: Cave Creek, AZ

Re: A Strictly Touring 1984 V6 ranger based Locost 7

Post by Off Road SHO »

No, the Taunus V-4 is what you're thinking about. The Cologne V-6 variants were the hot V-6's in Fords until the 3.0 and 3.2 SHO (From Yamaha) came along.

Tom
Sometimes, I'm as confused as a baby in a topless bar.

My short term memory is absolutely horrible and so is my short term memory.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sG16m2e4O6I
User avatar
carguy123
Toyotaphobe
Posts: 4829
Joined: April 5, 2008, 2:25 am
Building: Choppercrosser
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

Re: A Strictly Touring 1984 V6 ranger based Locost 7

Post by carguy123 »

Yup, you're right. The names they give them confuse me.

So what size is the Cologne? What did it come in over here? Physically it's tiny.
mobilito ergo sum
I drive therefore I am

I can explain it to you,
but I can't understand it for you.
User avatar
benny_toe
Posts: 1307
Joined: December 24, 2007, 5:11 am
Building: +4 20 valve screamer
Location: Seattle area

Re: A Strictly Touring 1984 V6 ranger based Locost 7

Post by benny_toe »

I had a couple in Mercury Capri's. Blew the cam bearings on one (lost oil pressure) and picked up a replacement at a local wrecker. They had 4 and I had my choice for $75. Always thought it a great engine.

Was a guy in KC just before I moved away that had one in a Formula Ford with a turbo from a Corvair. Ran quite well.
Larry in Seattle
User avatar
Lonnie-S
Posts: 5326
Joined: October 24, 2008, 2:13 pm
Building: V6 Powered Locost
Location: Carlsbad, California, USA

Re: A Strictly Touring 1984 V6 ranger based Locost 7

Post by Lonnie-S »

carguy123 wrote:Yup, you're right. The names they give them confuse me.

So what size is the Cologne? What did it come in over here? Physically it's tiny.


Do you remember the pretty little German Ford Capri's that were sold here by Lincoln-Mercury dealers? That's where they became known to us. The "Cologne" engines grew from 2.8L to 4.0L eventually, and there's even a Cosworth 24 valve version. There is a lot of speed equipment available for it in Europe. It's a 60 degree V6, so very compact.

Here's a little YouTube video of some Capri's on a race track ==> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pbf5BfSpylA

Cheers,
Damn! That front slip angle is way too large and the Ackerman is just a muddle.

Build Log: viewtopic.php?f=35&t=5886
User avatar
TRX
Posts: 1616
Joined: March 30, 2011, 7:18 am
Building: Locost variant
Location: central Arkansas

Re: A Strictly Touring 1984 V6 ranger based Locost 7

Post by TRX »

The Taunus V4 came first. It was a 60 degree V4 with a balance shaft, available from 1.0 to 1.4 liters. SAAB used it in the early Sonnetts, and Ford's industrial division sold them in the USA to power irrigation pumps.

Ford tacked on two more cylinders and deleted the balance shaft, creating the V6 line. German and American Capris and a handful of Mustang IIs came with the 2.6 liter version; British Capris came with a different, British-designed 3.0 V6. (known as the "Essex" engine)

Ford opened the 2.6 up to 2.8, and the British started using that one. The Mustang II and Capri went away, but the Ranger pickup began using it.

Ford punched the engine out to 4.0L for the Explorer, and came out with an SOHC version. That was the last of the Cologne series.

There are quite a few differences between the Ranger 2.8 and the Capri 2.8; the 4.0 versions have very little interchangeability with the earlier engines. Parts for the early 2.8 and the 2.6 are mostly boutique items and expensive now.

If you're planning to rebuild a Ranger 2.8, give Norm at Team Blitz a call. He has a couple of pallets of brand new factory engines he'd like to sell...
User avatar
STranger 7
Posts: 528
Joined: July 20, 2010, 7:56 pm
Building: 442e with ranger V6
Location: Warrenton, Virginia

Re: A Strictly Touring 1984 V6 ranger based Locost 7

Post by STranger 7 »

The 1984 ranger 2.8L V6 had 89k on it when pulled. Ran strong. Smoked a little, which is typical of 2.8s, because of valve seals.
I checked "Norm at Team Blitzs" Ebay sales page and found rebuilt long blocks, line bored and internally balanced, for $1495.00 with $400.00 estimated shipping.
That sounds good to me. Maybe after it's on the road.
At this point I'm looking for the most Locost path to finishing it so it can be driven.
The prices for shocks, a shortened drive shaft and gauges has me backing off of any unnecessary spending.
Lots of room for upgrades latter. :)
Ron

Took pictures of one of my MGB overflow tanks. Looks to be brass.
MG overflow tank 01.jpg

MG overflow tank 02.jpg

MG overflow tank 03.jpg

Could look nice on the firewall.
Ron
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"Age is an issue of mind over matter. If you don't mind, it doesn't matter." - Mark Twain
In my defense the moon was full and I was left unsupervised
User avatar
STranger 7
Posts: 528
Joined: July 20, 2010, 7:56 pm
Building: 442e with ranger V6
Location: Warrenton, Virginia

Re: A Strictly Touring 1984 V6 ranger based Locost 7

Post by STranger 7 »

Picked up more parts. For now, going with an upholstered rear bulkhead and seat cushions. Using this back seat for materials.
seat from a 1999 Lexus ES300.jpg

Also picked up an 18 gauge certified gas storage tank with vented cap, to use as a gas tank.
15galtank03.jpg

I think it will work until one can be made to fit lower
15galtank01.jpg

15galtank02.jpg

At 15 gallons it measures end to end 38.5 inches and 11 inches in diameter.
Ron
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"Age is an issue of mind over matter. If you don't mind, it doesn't matter." - Mark Twain
In my defense the moon was full and I was left unsupervised
User avatar
Lonnie-S
Posts: 5326
Joined: October 24, 2008, 2:13 pm
Building: V6 Powered Locost
Location: Carlsbad, California, USA

Re: A Strictly Touring 1984 V6 ranger based Locost 7

Post by Lonnie-S »

Pretty fancy seats, dude. Are they out of a Caddy or other high-end car?

Cheers,
Damn! That front slip angle is way too large and the Ackerman is just a muddle.

Build Log: viewtopic.php?f=35&t=5886
User avatar
STranger 7
Posts: 528
Joined: July 20, 2010, 7:56 pm
Building: 442e with ranger V6
Location: Warrenton, Virginia

Re: A Strictly Touring 1984 V6 ranger based Locost 7

Post by STranger 7 »

Hey Lonnie!
They're from a 1999 Lexus ES300.
Ron
"Age is an issue of mind over matter. If you don't mind, it doesn't matter." - Mark Twain
In my defense the moon was full and I was left unsupervised
User avatar
STranger 7
Posts: 528
Joined: July 20, 2010, 7:56 pm
Building: 442e with ranger V6
Location: Warrenton, Virginia

Re: A Strictly Touring 1984 V6 ranger based Locost 7

Post by STranger 7 »

I started playing with the Sketchup model. When the tubes for the rear sheet metal are extended 2" back, the tank can sit low enough to have trunk/storage space.
15galtank04.jpg

15galtank06.jpg

15galtank05.jpg

15galtank07.jpg

Also thinking about making the back tubing and the roll bar one piece and making it detachable at the top of the bulkhead and at the point where the bend at the bottom meets the frame.
15galtank08.jpg

I need to think about the trade offs.
Ron
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"Age is an issue of mind over matter. If you don't mind, it doesn't matter." - Mark Twain
In my defense the moon was full and I was left unsupervised
User avatar
STranger 7
Posts: 528
Joined: July 20, 2010, 7:56 pm
Building: 442e with ranger V6
Location: Warrenton, Virginia

Re: A Strictly Touring 1984 V6 ranger based Locost 7

Post by STranger 7 »

15galtank09.jpg

15galtank10.jpg

This is almost final
15galtank14.jpg

15galtank15.jpg



Ron
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"Age is an issue of mind over matter. If you don't mind, it doesn't matter." - Mark Twain
In my defense the moon was full and I was left unsupervised
User avatar
STranger 7
Posts: 528
Joined: July 20, 2010, 7:56 pm
Building: 442e with ranger V6
Location: Warrenton, Virginia

Re: A Strictly Touring 1984 V6 ranger based Locost 7

Post by STranger 7 »

The idea for a detachable rear sub frame has been hanging around the back of my mind for awhile. Finding the 15 gallon tank for $60.00 pushed it to the forefront.

Should I get around to making a hardtop, I want it to be one piece including the scuttle. I also want gull wing doors.The spare tire will be inside the body.
These are some of the reference pictures.
1963 ht001.jpg

1963 ht002.jpg

dyn003_original_640_480_jpeg_2613123_a1fafbecbac79490a471e22d397fdfe6.jpg

150428gullltop-3m.jpg

ec45dcc8480c4f2bf7a9e2d4bd6d3a6c--jaguar-s-auto-jaguar.jpg

lotus7replicahardtop-l-5166460476cf0329.jpg


I want to keep a flat front wind screen and use a hatch to access the spare.

To switch to hardtop, the fenders come off, then the back is unplugged and unbolted, the wind screen and scuttle with wipers come off as one piece, and the hardtop bolts back in their place.
One afternoons work and I'll be ready for the " off " season.

At least that's the plan. With a back the unbolts, I have the option.
Ron

PS I'm going to use a 1985 HO carbureted sbf to push the extra weight. :wink:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"Age is an issue of mind over matter. If you don't mind, it doesn't matter." - Mark Twain
In my defense the moon was full and I was left unsupervised
User avatar
TRX
Posts: 1616
Joined: March 30, 2011, 7:18 am
Building: Locost variant
Location: central Arkansas

Re: A Strictly Touring 1984 V6 ranger based Locost 7

Post by TRX »

The VW one was ROFL...

Y'know, if you're going to go through the trouble of a top and gullwing doors, just hinging the whole thing at the back might be practical. Just latch it to the windshield frame to hold it closed when moving, plus a couple of gas struts to assist it opening.

There have been a number of show cars with similar arrangements, and at least one kit car.
User avatar
STranger 7
Posts: 528
Joined: July 20, 2010, 7:56 pm
Building: 442e with ranger V6
Location: Warrenton, Virginia

Re: A Strictly Touring 1984 V6 ranger based Locost 7

Post by STranger 7 »

TRX,
The VW photo shopped pic is included because it has a flat wind screen and the frame in part of the scuttle.
Front tilt, just in case the latch didn't hold?
fliptopt.jpg

You're right about how involved a hardtop like the one I want would be.And in the end it will depend on how much fun the 7 is to drive.
The only hard top I would care to have is one like I've described.
If I can't have that I'll just hop into my other car, the 1967 MGB GT with it's HO EFI 5.0 and T5. :)
Ron
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"Age is an issue of mind over matter. If you don't mind, it doesn't matter." - Mark Twain
In my defense the moon was full and I was left unsupervised
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests